Texas Real Estate Articles

I want to thank you for the information provided on your website. As a litigation lawyer, I have referred to this information more than once.

Brownsville Attorney Barry R. Benton

Thank you for the immediate response on a Saturday. I didn't think I would hear from you till Monday. Excellent customer service!

Client Jeff H.

I always check your website and it is very inspiring. Not to mention that you are a great attorney.

Investor Client Francisco P.

I frequently refer to your website and book when I get stuck on real estate matters. The information is extremely helpful.

San Antonio Attorney Lisa Galvan

I give your book an A+. You are a rock star in our legal community!

Woodlands Attorney David Borger

David, you are the man. The future of law is with you!


I was referred to Mr. Willis by a title company. Though his office uses email as the primary form of communication, his replies are surprisingly quick. Documents are produced very quickly as well, often within the day. Mr. Willis's level of detail and professionalism is top notch.

Client T. Scott

I have to say, these are the most detailed, best written real estate documents that I have seen so far. You really mean what you say on your website.

San Antonio Broker and Investor Rolando Flores

I was recently sued and showed my litigation attorney the asset protection structure that you built for us two years ago. “Perfect!” he said. Thank you, David.

Client Peter W.

What a great resource! I liked your book so much I purchased the Kindle version to have on my phone. I’ve recommended it to my investor and Realtor clients.

Dallas Attorney John Andrews

Months after setting up my LLC David Willis continued to answer questions and provide guidance, usually within a matter of hours. I would strongly recommend LoneStarLandLaw to any investor seeking a trusted business partner.

Client Robert H

I must say your articles always impress me. I like your style. I don't make it to Houston often, but next time I do, I owe you lunch.

Dallas Attorney Matthew Aycock

I was delighted to find your concise and well-written article on adverse possession. As a professional educator for 25 years, I appreciate the style and manner with which you approach public education. Thank you!

Client Hank M., Phd.

I would be happy to provide a testimonial although it looks like you have a long list of them already. Can't thank you enough. I'll definitely use your services in the future.

Client Ben P.

Your book is a terrific resource!

El Paso Attorney Kathleen Crook

Your book is a very easy and informative read. I will gladly and confidently refer clients to you.

Houston Attorney Kevin J. Smith

It is a rarity and a great pleasure to do business with someone who is so thorough, accurate and prompt.

Clients Rod and Michelle F.

Thank you very much for all your help! You have provided a very valuable service to me and I highly appreciate it. I will recommend you to everybody should someone ask me for an recommendation for a real estate attorney.

Client Sanjay P.

David Willis is the consummate real estate lawyer, and possesses uncanny skill at structuring deals.

Houston Attorney Carol Guess

Excellent book!

J. Thomas Black, Houston Attorney

I would never have expected David to reply to my email on a weekend but he did. He is a very diligent, dedicated, and knowledgeable attorney. The website is so informative - it offers easy-to-understand explanations to real estate and asset protection questions.

Client Chris V.

I've been so impressed with your website and your expertise. I would endorse you anytime.

Dallas Attorney Charlie Kim

As I acquired more investment properties – I now own about 50 rental houses – I became more concerned with asset protection. David Willis was able to create a simple two-company structure that recently withstood a court challenge. Having my real estate assets securely protected certainly adds to my peace of mind.

Client Bryan P.

Working with LoneStarLandLaw online was fast and efficient. I received high-quality, sophisticated legal documents - along with the advice I needed - without having to spend hours in a lawyer’s office.

Client John T.

David J. Willis is a clever lawyer who came up with a great plan to protect my rental property from lawsuits. I feel much more secure now. He is available by email whenever I have questions.

Client Marion W.

As a corporate attorney who does real estate I can say with confidence that David Willis is the real estate law leader in Texas.

Dallas Attorney Kevin Vela

I live in London but was buying a small apartment complex in Texas. Mr. Willis handled the whole transaction for me, as both my lawyer and real estate broker. It was a relief to put the transaction in the hands of someone who knows what he’s doing.

Client Phillip K.

My portfolio contains a mixture of rent houses and owner-financed properties. I rely on David Willis for evictions, foreclosures, deeds, leases, options, and the like. This is a guy who knows the system and gets the job done.

Client Darrell P.

As an attorney I am familiar with David Willis' expertise in real estate. I highly recommend his book. If David wrote it, you can depend on it!

Woodlands Attorney Paul Spielvogel

Not long ago my LLC was sued over a contract - and I was sued along with it, personally. David Willis was eventually able to get my name removed from the suit. He also filed a counterclaim for a frivolous lawsuit. He is an aggressive lawyer to have on your side.

Client James S.

Copyright © 2013. All rights reserved worldwide.


Including Comments on the Impact on Owner Finance in Texas

by David J. Willis, J.D., LL.M.


Certain home loans have been defined by the Federal Reserve as being "higher-priced mortgage loans" because (in part) the annual percentage rate charged on such loans exceeds the average prime rate by 1.5% for a first lien or 3.5% for a subordinate lien. Rules in this area are particularly important in the area of owner-financed transactions since the APR is usually higher than in conventional or FHA financing. Specifically, if the loan application date is later than April 1, 2010; if the loan will be a first or subordinate lien on a one-to-four family residence; the property will be owner occupied; and if the APR exceeds the amounts stated above, then such a loan is classified as a higher-priced mortgage loan and new law applies.

Applicable Law

Applicable law is Regulation Z (12 CFR Part 226), specifically Section 226.35 which is set forth in full at the end of this article. The higher-priced mortgage loan regulations are sometimes referred to as "HPML regs" and such loans are often called "Section 35 loans" or "HPML loans." Section 226.35, entitled "Prohibited Acts or Practices in Connection with Higher-Priced Mortgage Loans," became effective October 1, 2009 except for rules requiring collection of an escrow which became effective April 1, 2010.

Laws Impacting Owner Finance

The HPML regs are part of a wave of federal regulation designed to curb abuses in the owner finance industry which contributed to the accumulation of bad loans in lenders’ portfolios and the subsequent collapse of the national real estate market. Among the new laws is Dodd-Frank, which requires that a residential seller/lender in an owner-financed transaction perform due diligence in order to determine that the buyer/borrower has the ability to repay the loan; the federal S.A.F.E. Act (implemented in Texas Finance Code Ch.180 as the "Texas Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 2009" or "T-S.A.F.E.") which requires that a seller/lender of one-to-four family residence in an owner-financed transaction have a residential mortgage loan origination (RMLO) license issued by the Texas Savings and Mortgage Lending Department; a new Texas requirement that the seller give both the existing lienholder and the buyer a 7 day written notice prior to closing a transaction with an existing loan in place; and burdensome rules relating to contracts for deed and other executory contracts contained in Texas Property Code Sec. 5.061 et seq.

Texas was formerly the wild west of seller financing. Recall the practice of "red flagging" rural lots? Those days are long gone.

HPML Escrow Requirement

The seller in an owner-financed transaction subject to HPML regs must establish an escrow account. Sec. 226.35(b)(3)(i) states that "a creditor may not extend a loan secured by a first lien on a principal dwelling unless an escrow account is established before consummation for payment of property taxes and premiums for mortgage-related insurance required by the creditor, such as insurance against loss of or damage to property, or against liability arising out of the ownership or use of the property, or insurance protecting the creditor against the consumer’s default or other credit loss."

This regulation requires that an escrow account be established before "consummation for payment of property taxes and premiums." When does such consummation occur? The language is unclear, but it is reasonable to interpret "consummation" in this context as the shift to the buyer of the obligation to pay ad valorem taxes and insurance premiums – and this occurs at closing. At the very least, therefore, an escrow account should be established at closing.

A common practice is to provide for an escrow that commences with the first monthly payment. This would not appear to comply with Sec. 226.35(b)(3)(i) since the escrow was not established at closing – an escrow account, after all, cannot be commenced with a zero balance. As a practical matter, therefore, it may therefore be necessary to open an escrow at closing with deposit by the buyer of an initial escrow amount, even if that amount is nominal.

What if a buyer wants to terminate the required escrow? This appears to be permissible according to Sec. 226.35(b)(3)(iii) which states that a "creditor or servicer may permit a consumer to cancel the escrow account required in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section only in response to a consumer’s dated written request to cancel the escrow account that is received no earlier than 365 days after consummation." Must a seller/lender comply with such a request? The statute’s use of the word "may" rather "must" suggests that the seller may decline a buyer’s request to terminate the escrow.

The Role of Third-Party Servicers

The traditional Texas owner-financed transaction contemplates that the seller will receive and handle both payments of principal and interest as well as escrow. There are, however, potential problems with this approach. Will the seller report the amount of interest paid to the IRS? Will the seller have the capability of generating an escrow analysis if required? Does the seller report timely payment history to the credit bureaus? Most individual sellers are neither equipped nor inclined to perform these duties.

There is also the matter of trusting the seller on certain key items. For example, timely payment of taxes and insurance premiums. What if the seller fails to do this and instead mishandles the escrow? Another example of trust occurs in wraparound transactions, in which the buyer agrees to make payments to the seller and the seller, in turn, promises to make payments to the first lienholder. What if the seller defaults on this obligation? A solution to these issues is to engage a third-party servicer who will collect payments from the buyer (including by electronic means) and see to it that any escrow or secondary payments are properly made.


The higher-priced mortgage loan rules (Regulation Z - 12 CFR Part 226) are, along with the S.A.F.E. Act and Dodd Frank, part of a federal trend to impose nationwide regulations upon certain lending practices as they relate to owner finance. Texas, once the haven for easy money, now finds itself in the same highly-regulated environment as everyone else.


Information in this article is proved for general informational and educational purposes only and is not offered as legal advice upon which anyone may rely. The law changes. Legal counsel relating to your individual needs and circumstances is advisable before taking any action that has legal consequences. Consult your tax advisor as well. This firm does not represent you unless and until it is expressly retained in writing to do so.

Copyright © 2013 by David J. Willis. All rights reserved worldwide. David J. Willis is board certified in both residential and commercial real estate law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. More information is available at his website, http://www.LoneStarLandLaw.com


(Effective on October 1, 2009, except for (b)(3) which is effective on April 1, 2010)

§ 226.35 Prohibited Acts or Practices in Connection with Higher-Priced Mortgage Loans.
(a) Higher-priced mortgage loans.

(1) For purposes of this section, a higher-priced mortgage loan is a consumer credit transaction secured by the consumer’s principal dwelling with an annual percentage rate that exceeds the average prime offer rate for a comparable transaction as of the date the interest rate is set by 1.5 or more percentage points for loans secured by a first lien on a dwelling, or by 3.5 or more percentage points for loans secured by a subordinate lien on a dwelling.

(2) "Average prime offer rate" means an annual percentage rate that is derived from average interest rates, points, and other loan pricing terms currently offered to consumers by a representative sample of creditors for mortgage transactions that have low-risk pricing characteristics. The Board publishes average prime offer rates for a broad range of types of transactions in a table updated at least weekly as well as the methodology the Board uses to derive these rates.

(3) Notwithstanding paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the term "higher-priced mortgage loan" does not include a transaction to finance the initial construction of a dwelling, a temporary or "bridge" loan with a term of twelve months or less, such as a loan to purchase a new dwelling where the consumer plans to sell a current dwelling within twelve months, a reverse-mortgage transaction subject to §226.33, or a home equity line of credit subject to §226.5b.

(b) Rules for higher-priced mortgage loans. Higher-priced mortgage loans are subject to the following restrictions:

(1) Repayment ability. A creditor shall not extend credit based on the value of the consumer’s collateral without regard to the consumer’s repayment ability as of consummation as provided in §226.34(a)(4).

(2) Prepayment penalties. A loan may not include a penalty described by §226.32(d)(6) unless:

(i) The penalty is otherwise permitted by law, including §226.32(d)(7) if the loan is a mortgage transaction described in §226.32(a); and

(ii) Under the terms of the loan–
(A) The penalty will not apply after the two-year period following consummation;
(B) The penalty will not apply if the source of the prepayment funds is a refinancing by the creditor or an affiliate of the creditor; and
(C) The amount of the periodic payment of principal or interest or both may not change during the four-year period following consummation.

(3) Escrows
(i) Failure to escrow for property taxes and insurance. Except as provided in paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section, a creditor may not extend a loan secured by a first lien on a principal dwelling unless an escrow account is established before consummation for payment of property taxes and premiums for mortgage-related insurance required by the creditor, such as insurance against loss of or damage to property, or against liability arising out of the ownership or use of the property, or insurance protecting the creditor against the consumer’s default or other credit loss.

(ii) Exemptions for loans secured by shares in a cooperative and for certain condominium units
(A) Escrow accounts need not be established for loans secured by shares in a cooperative; and
(B) Insurance premiums described in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section need not be included in escrow accounts for loans secured by condominium units, where the condominium association has an obligation to the condominium unit owners to maintain a master policy insuring condominium units.

(iii) Cancellation. A creditor or servicer may permit a consumer to cancel the escrow account required in paragraph (b)(3)(i) of this section only in response to a consumer’s dated written request to cancel the escrow account that is received no earlier than 365 days after consummation.

(iv) Definition of escrow account. For purposes of this section, "escrow account" shall have the same meaning as in 24 CFR 3500.17(b) as amended.

(4) Evasion; open-end credit. In connection with credit secured by a consumer’s principal dwelling that does not meet the definition of open-end credit in §226.2(a)(20), a creditor shall not structure a home-secured loan as an open-end plan to evade the requirements of this section.